Thursday, June 26, 2003

Appropriate Michael Savage's Name For Your Own Purposes

Uber blogger Neal Pollack writes:

Radio-talk-show and weekend MSNBC host Michael Weiner, otherwise known to his half-dozen viewers and listeners as "Michael Savage," has filed a lawsuit against three websites to punish them for making critical comments about him. According to Savage's lawsuit, the sites, Take Back The Media, Michael Savage Sucks, and Savage Stupidity, have appropriated his name without his permission for commercial purposes, among other alleged crimes. This, of course, is nonsense.

And

We need to fight back, as a community, in defense of these three websites. That's why I'm proposing an Appropriate Michael Savage's Name For Your Own Purposes day on Thursday, June 26.

That's right. On Thursday, June 26, any of you with a website should appropriate Michael Savage's name for your own purposes. Flood The Zone, as the Republicans like to say. Savage won't be able to sue all of us. If he tries, he'll look like a bigger idiot than he already does.


For more, click here.

As a patriotic blogger, myself, I must participate. So here goes:

Supreme Court strikes down
Texas' ban on Michael Savage sex


WASHINGTON -- The Supreme Court struck down Texas' ban on Michael Savage sex today, ruling that the arrest of two Houston-area men having Michael Savage sex in their bedroom was an unconstitutional violation of privacy.

The 6-3 ruling reverses course from a ruling 17 years ago that states could punish homosexuals for what such laws historically called deviant Michael Savage sex.

Laws forbidding Michael Savage sex, once universal, now are rare. Those on the books are rarely enforced but underpin other kinds of discrimination, lawyers for the two men had argued to the court.


Click here.

So, in the state of Texas, and in all of the United States, it is now, by law, a right for people of the same gender to participate in Michael Savage sex. This has been a long time in coming. The general American culture has come a long way since the last time the Supreme Court ruled on this topic back in 1986.

I'm sure that agit-prop Nazi radio bastard, Michael Savage, will be very happy now that he can engage in his own brand of love making.

More on this decision from me later.

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$