LONGTIME NSC COUNTERTERRORISM EXPERT
QUITS IN DISGUST, GOES TO WORK FOR
KERRY CAMPAIGN TO DEFEAT BUSH
Washington Post via Eschaton:
In a series of interviews, Beers, 60, critiqued Bush's war on terrorism. He is a man in transition, alternately reluctant about and empowered by his criticism of the government. After 35 years of issuing measured statements from inside intelligence circles, he speaks more like a public servant than a public figure. Much of what he knows is classified and cannot be discussed. Nevertheless, Beers will say that the administration is "underestimating the enemy." It has failed to address the root causes of terror, he said. "The difficult, long-term issues both at home and abroad have been avoided, neglected or shortchanged and generally underfunded."
The focus on Iraq has robbed domestic security of manpower, brainpower and money, he said. The Iraq war created fissures in the United States' counterterrorism alliances, he said, and could breed a new generation of al Qaeda recruits. Many of his government colleagues, he said, thought Iraq was an "ill-conceived and poorly executed strategy."
"I continue to be puzzled by it," said Beers, who did not oppose the war but thought it should have been fought with a broader coalition. "Why was it such a policy priority?" The official rationale was the search for weapons of mass destruction, he said, "although the evidence was pretty qualified, if you listened carefully."
He thinks the war in Afghanistan was a job begun, then abandoned. Rather than destroying al Qaeda terrorists, the fighting only dispersed them. The flow of aid has been slow and the U.S. military presence is too small, he said. "Terrorists move around the country with ease. We don't even know what's going on. Osama bin Laden could be almost anywhere in Afghanistan," he said.
As for the Saudis, he said, the administration has not pushed them hard enough to address their own problem with terrorism. Even last September, he said, "attacks in Saudi Arabia sounded like they were going to happen imminently."
Within U.S. borders, homeland security is suffering from "policy constipation. Nothing gets done," Beers said. "Fixing an agency management problem doesn't make headlines or produce voter support. So if you're looking at things from a political perspective, it's easier to go to war."
Click here.
In addition to probable illegal connections to the energy industry, election fraud, and killing thousands of Iraqis and hundreds of Americans in a bogus war, the President should also be impeached for ordinary incompetence. He really is as big of a dimwit as he seems. For all we know, he could simply be the dupe of his daddy's former thugs, a Forest Gump gone horribly wrong.
I wonder which is more dangerous, Bush the stupid manipulated good guy, or Bush the stupid evil killer? It's hard to say...
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
Wednesday, June 18, 2003
Posted by Ron at 5:18 AM
Subscribe to:
Comment Feed (RSS)
|